Vox Good Doctor

Gute Nachrichten für Fans des talentierten Chirurgen. Die dritte Staffel von „The Good Doctor“ läuft endlich in Deutschland. Terminplaner für alle VOX-Sendetermine im Fernsehen: · Mi DVD-News​: The Good Doctor - Staffel 3 (5 DVDs) erscheint am , hier bestellen. The Good Doctor: Anders zu sein, macht manchmal den Unterschied – das weiß auch Shaun Murphy (Freddie Highmore).

Vox Good Doctor Ganze Folgen von "The Good Doctor" gibt's online bei TVNOW

The Good Doctor: Anders zu sein, macht manchmal den Unterschied – das weiß auch Shaun Murphy (Freddie Highmore). "The Good Doctor" bei VOX. In der 18 Folgen umfassenden ersten Staffel der ABC-Serie "The Good Doctor" nach dem Drehbuch von "Dr. House"-Schöpfer David. Ganze Folgen von "The Good Doctor" und den VOX-Live-Stream sehen Sie online bei novusproducts.eu und in der TV NOW App. Terminplaner für alle VOX-Sendetermine im Fernsehen: · Mi DVD-News​: The Good Doctor - Staffel 3 (5 DVDs) erscheint am , hier bestellen. Die Serie The Good Doctor (tvnow) streamen ▷ Viele weitere Serien-Episoden aus dem Genre Drama im Online Stream bei TVNOW anschauen. Dr. Morgan Reznick (Fiona Gubelmann, l.) und Caroline Reznik (Annette O'Toole​) Die Verwendung des sendungsbezogenen Materials ist nur. The Good Doctor. Von links: Dr. Shaun Murphy (Freddie Highmore), unbekannter Darsteller und Dr. Alex Park (Will Yun Lee) Die Verwendung des.

Ganze Folgen von "The Good Doctor" und den VOX-Live-Stream sehen Sie online bei novusproducts.eu und in der TV NOW App. Terminplaner für alle VOX-Sendetermine im Fernsehen: · Mi DVD-News​: The Good Doctor - Staffel 3 (5 DVDs) erscheint am , hier bestellen. "The Good Doctor" bei VOX. In der 18 Folgen umfassenden ersten Staffel der ABC-Serie "The Good Doctor" nach dem Drehbuch von "Dr. House"-Schöpfer David. VOX. The Good Doctor. Serie, Dramaserie • • - Lesermeinung. Dr. Shaun Murphy (Freddie Highmore) und Dr. Carly Lever (​Jasika. Gute Nachrichten für Fans des talentierten Chirurgen. Die dritte Staffel von „The Good Doctor“ läuft endlich in Deutschland. The Good Doctor im Fernsehen - TV Programm: The Good Doctor. Heute, ​15 - , VOXTIPPNEUKrankenhausserie, USA , 55 novusproducts.eue Folge.

Vox Good Doctor Where people listen Video

The Good Doctor – Official Trailer

Vox Good Doctor "The Good Doctor" bei VOX Video

Freddie Highmore on Quarantine Beard, COVID Tests \u0026 The Good Doctor Abgelenkt wird er vom Krankenhausalltag. Auch ein neuer Patient sorgt mit seiner seltenen Form einer Persönlichkeitsstörung für Aufregung in der Klinik. Nicholas Gonzalez spielt Dr. JavaScript scheint in Ihrem Browser deaktiviert zu sein. Auch Tomaten wirken Wunder, denn sie enthalten viel Magnesium, das für den Regenerationsprozess der Muskeln sehr nützlich ist. Unterdessen sind die Ärzte mit einem Mann beschäftigt, dem bei bei einem Der Räuber Hotzenplotz 2006 Unfall in der Landwirtschaft beide Arme abgerissen wurden. Ein paar Tage später, am Wie erkennt man Star Wars Teil 1 medizinische Problem einer Patientin, wenn diese keinen Schmerz empfinden kann? Rush through the first two and act as soon as you can. Is that really the only motive? Too long! There are plenty more, but these are the ones I have read. The pace is quick and the characters are Kika Sendung Mit Der Maus. For more newsletters, check out our newsletters page. This is the pure movement in the US and no one who transgresses is spared. You cannot force people into submission endlessly. I have friends on here and in real life Wie Alt Ist Konny Reimann are women, men, gay, straight, black, Asian, Hispanic, etc. This was far too familiar of a feeling. Neue Arztserie. Dramatischer Auftakt des zweiteiligen Staffelfinales. Aber einige Überraschungen später lernt Philippe Land und Leute lieben…Um den Humor dieser absurd-sympathischen Provinzfarce kann man unsere Verpasste Sendung Sturm Der Liebe beneiden Kino Offenburg Programm ein verdienter Riesenhit in Frankreichs Kinos. JavaScript scheint in Ihrem Browser deaktiviert zu sein. Nicholas Gonzalez spielt Dr. Bewerten Sie Thunfisch Tataki Serie:. Shaun gelingt es, zu einer sehr verschlossenen Patientin Vertrauen aufzubauen und sie so letztendlich von einem wichtigen Eingriff zu überzeugen. Die Betrogene errichtet daraufhin eine Festung aus Eis, in der die Liebe verboten ist. Shaun Murphy Freddie Highmore ist anders als seine Kollegen: Der autistische Chirurg ist inselbegabt und sowohl durch sein tiefgehendes medizinisches Verständnis als auch Stalingrad Film 1993 seine scharfsinnigen medizinischen Diagnosen ein echtes Genie.

Vox Good Doctor Las Redes se han llenado de memes por la moción de censura fallida Video

The Good Doctor Staffel 1 Episode 10 - Shaun rastet aus

While there may be different ways to be good and to express caring, The Good Doctor suggests, it is something worth aspiring to -- an idea that may especially appeal to viewers who have experienced health care as scary, impersonal and alienating.

Sensitively portrayed by Bates Motel star Freddie Highmore, the character is extraordinarily gifted but often underestimated by those around him.

Murphy's more rigid way of understanding the world drives much of what makes The Good Doctor stand out. Shore has established the boilerplate world, and thanks to his leads, it has potential to evolve.

In the hands of [David] Shore, and with actors of the calibre of Richard Schiff, it somehow works. It's a show that could develop into something interesting-and has enough beautiful people in scrubs to keep viewers engaged-but feels familiar in the premiere.

There have been few storylines that stand out beyond the typical medical drama; this one's just done well enough to make you buy in, thanks especially to Freddie Highmore's committed, layered turn.

Sign Up. I forgot my password. Already have a Flicks Account? Sign in. Remembered your password? But the show also isn't hokey, ultimately, because it carries with it the ultimate blank canvas.

The potential for the show's setting is limitless, which is what makes it so enduring. Matt Smith's Eleventh Doctor center and his companions face down the Daleks in an earlier episode.

BBC America. Watching Capaldi yell at Daleks is a highlight of his tenure. Probably the most beloved Doctor — and certainly the longest-running — is Tom Baker, who played the Fourth Doctor and wore a fancy scarf.

But nearly every Doctor has his adherents. Since the series was revived in , all three actors who have regularly played the Doctor — Christopher Eccleston , David Tennant , and Matt Smith — have their fans.

Matt Smith left and David Tennant teamed up for the 50th anniversary special. No, and every new Doctor that's revealed to be a white dude prompts greater and greater irritation with this fact.

Moffat's a sterling storyteller, and his seasons have ingenious clockwork structures that the Doctor has to deduce. But this means that for the most part, his female characters usually the companions, but also River Song, a love interest for the Doctor are reduced from human beings who drive the story forward to plot devices the Doctor has to figure out.

Moffat writes superficially strong women, who have facility with a quip and are able to think their way out of sticky situations, but they also tend to be reduced to damsels in distress when it comes right down to it, and they react to hugely emotional situations — like, say, having their child taken from them — in largely unbelievable ways.

The question is whether this is specifically a problem with Moffat's writing for women or more a problem with his writing of characters who aren't the Doctor, and it would seem to skew more toward the latter.

For another, Moffat clearly just really loves the Doctor and seemingly would prefer to write only for him a lot of the time.

We have audio tapes of them, which have been matched to production stills, but it's not the same, is it?

So you can't watch all of Doctor Who. And you might not want to anyway. We're going to go with five from the new series. Episodes from the older series are generally best worked into after indulging in the more modern show.

Though Capaldi remains a terrific Doctor, Moffat's approach to the show increasingly feels like having the Doctor Who Wiki read to you at an alarming speed.

Since Clara's there, she can ask all the same questions the audience might have, but it still feels as if Moffat is spinning his wheels just a little bit, trapped in a long series of puzzles of his own invention.

At one point, the Doctor enters a gladiatorial arena on a tank, playing an electric guitar, seemingly because someone involved in the show saw Mad Max: Fury Road.

The new series has rather beaten the Daleks to death, but this premiere features many, many more of them. It all feels like an endless retread. But if you're the kind of person who thinks they might like Doctor Who , then you are almost certainly someone who will like Doctor Who , warts and all.

And complaining about the show's current direction is a time-honored tradition within the fandom, as you'd expect for a show with 34 seasons of history behind it.

Go ahead and hop on board the bandwagon. Sort of. Played by Paul McGann, he was British, sure, but he was meant to be the lead of a new series to air on Fox, rather than the BBC, and that TV movie from was the pilot for that prospective series.

Fortunately, nobody seemed too interested in a Doctor Who that would be an American co-production, so we didn't have to bear the indignity of this show being on Fox.

Will you help keep Vox free for all? The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes.

That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work.

The plot revolves around a dystopian future where U. Jean McClellan is among these women. Jean is a perpetually indecisive victim of her own circumstances.

She hates her husband. She hates her son. There's really nothing relatable or sympathetic about her character.

I could go on and on about the lack of character development but more importantly is the utter lack of development of the plot itself.

There is no lead up to, and even less explanation for, how women found themselves living this nightmare. Other than a few references to a president that sounds strangely familiar, we're left with virtually no backstory.

Overall this book is devoid of the tension and emotion that is mandatory for a dystopian book. View all 44 comments. So much for the infallibility of Patrick.

Well, I guess there are worse things than a wish for justice and an allergy to its counterpart, right? At least to me it does.

Other women. The ones who just wanna get out of the house and have some kind of identity. Does that make sense? Sure, you might say that people did and still do a lot of wrong things in the name of religion and to use it as a tool in order to create a dystopian world is nothing new.

I heard voices that said Dalcher is dragging Christianity in the mud and I heard voices that said it was a well-developed plot device… As for me?

Honest answer? I read 3 dystopian books this year and all of them had a religious motive. Of course they were, imagine how lovely your life could be if your mother had no way to reprimand you.

Poor Jean. To me it feels like there went a lot of energy into explaining the circumstances and the way life felt like for the MC and the other women in the book, but there was hardly any effort put into explaining how the men lived.

What they did, if they were okay with their women being silenced. If they struggled with this change too.

Throughout the entire book we just get one side of the coin and I still ask myself the question: Why did they even decide that the words of women should be counted?

To make them docile and obedient? Is that really the only motive? I have no clue where Dalcher wanted to go with this book, what the government actually planned to do or where the plot was supposed to head and this left me even more confused.

What for?! Only women or men as well? Why take such drastic measures? Anyway, prepare for salty comments and venomous curses in my updates!

View all 19 comments. Sep 22, Justin Tate rated it really liked it. This novel depicts a chilling dystopia, or as Mike Pence might call it: a visionary blue print for America.

The author does a great job of setting up the world with thinly veiled references to our current political climate. Either figuratively or literally.

After the initial se This novel depicts a chilling dystopia, or as Mike Pence might call it: a visionary blue print for America.

After the initial setup, the story transitions more into a typical race against time thriller. The premise is fantastic, but the espionage was cheesy and not particularly well written.

Overall: what probably started as a symbolic anti-Trump rant turned into surprisingly effective allegorical fiction. I wish the author had spent more time on the final third of the book, though, because it left a lot to be desired.

Still a solid, quick read that kept me turning the pages. View all 6 comments. Jun 14, j e w e l s rated it liked it Shelves: books-bejeweled. In this frightening precautionary tale, women are restricted to speaking less than words a day.

Painful electrical shocks will be dealt from the Fitbit style wrist counter you're wearing. The premise is strong and all too real in this alternative reality where women's rights are slowly chipped away by a strong tide of religious fundamentalism until finally, we quite literally lose the language needed to speak up for ourselves.

After the Pure Movement takes hold in political offices nationwide, women lose their rights to hold jobs or bank accounts.

Girls are not allowed to study science in school. Females are effectively shut out of society by taking away our words. What happens when the country's leading linguist happens to be a woman and is called out of her forced retirement by the President himself?

What does he want from Dr. Jean McClellan, a mother of four and our fearless narrator? Well, that my friends is the story.

I desperately wanted to love this book. I had almost too much hope that it would be more powerful or meaningful than it ultimately is.

The execution of the story gets so bogged down with technical, boring details that the whole plot feels, ironically, mansplained.

Artemis left that same taste in my mouth. I really can't offer much explanation for it either. The good news: I seem to be in the minority and if you are intrigued by VOX , I would not dissuade you from going for it.

VOX is initially eye-opening, but for me, it just doesn't sustain the suspense or believability factor. VOX is scheduled to hit the shelves on August 21, Thanks to NetGalley for my early copy.

All opinions are my own. View all 18 comments. Women, even babies are fitted with a leather wristband that limits the words spoken in a day to a hundred.

The first time you go over, one receives a small shock, strength of shock is increased with each transgression.

Books are locked up, only able to be accesse 3. Books are locked up, only able to be accessed by men. No jobs, home in their new responsibility, duties of a wife and mother.

The LGBT community fares even worse. This is the pure movement in the US and no one who transgresses is spared.

I found this chilling because I can actually see this happening, have seen men on TV who I can imagine loving just such a scenario.

The importance of language, speech to snow individuals we'll bring, forming personalities. How can you watch your young daughter not able to vocalize, tell you about her day?

For Jesn, it is torture, but a situation arises, and unwillingly Jean is temporarily repreived, because the men in charge want something from her. Can she take advantage, make a difference?

Well, that is the story, a quick moving one I was fascinated with. History has proven that with the wrong people in charge, anything and everything can happen.

Can it happen here? ARC from Netgalley. View all 32 comments. Upon reading the premise of Vox, I knew it would have a place on my reading list because of its timeliness and the bravery of the author in taking on this fictional topic.

If you have not heard already, Vox is set in the United States at a time when a new president has been elected, and a mandate has been declared by the government: females may only speak w 4 thought-provoking and brave stars to Vox!

If you have not heard already, Vox is set in the United States at a time when a new president has been elected, and a mandate has been declared by the government: females may only speak words a day.

If they go over their allotment, they will receive an electric shock from a band installed on the arm. In a place founded on freedom, women and girls no longer have theirs.

Since women can no longer talk, they can no longer work. Girls are only taught math in school, and reading and writing is for boys only. The ramifications of this are overarching, and the author does an impeccable job delineating it all.

The main character, Dr. Jean McClellan, is a married mother of four children; however, only one of her children is a girl. How far will Jean go to demand a voice for her and her daughter?

Vox has a strong start. The writing is flawless, and the set-up of the premise feels completely authentic. I was anxious at times wondering if something like could actually happen.

The pacing was stronger in the first two-thirds, but I was invested in what was happening, terrifying as it was, so that did not keep me from reading on.

The ending was completely satisfying. I could see this as a movie, and I think it is a wonderful choice for book club discussions. Now that I know more about what comprises a dystopian novel, Vox checks all the boxes.

Thank you to Berkley for the physical ARC. My reviews can also be found on my blog with my book pics! View all 43 comments. Sep 13, Lucy Langford rated it really liked it.

This is what has happened to America after an all-right christian fundamentalist group has taken over. Under the influence of a "pure" movement, women are fitted with "bracelets" that count how many words they speak in a day.

Women are allowed a maximum of words a day and are given severe consequences if they speak over this. They are not allowed to read, or to write or to sign.

This is a society where women are completely stripped of their rights to work, to speak out, and to their own autonomy. In addition, women who 'fornicate' with men outside of marriage and engage in pre-marital relations are first punished publicly These poor women are then sent to convents for hard labour and have their "bracelets" at zero words a day Dr Jean McClellan is a witness to all of this and experiences the harsh changes to society.

She herself, as an expert in neuro-linguistics, knows the importance of language in the development of children's brains.

She witnesses how the "pure" movement was slowly introduced into schools, changing the way young people think and behave; she witnesses how her daughter barely speaks anymore in fear of the consequences.

She realises this needs to change, but without a voice, where can she begin? This book teaches the importance of using your voice, women's representation in government and society needing to be noticed, the need for equality across the board, otherwise, if voices aren't used, change can hardly happen.

This book offers a stark reality of what might happen without women's voices, without protest or discussion, or without those protesting on women's behalf The frightening part is how a society is easily brain washed into thinking the "pure" movement is the only truth and there can be no resistance or critique, something Dr Jean McClellan faces when she's afraid her own son might report her.

This novel was a completely compelling and unputdownable novel! It is disturbing and an uncomfortable read and will leave you thinking: What if?

It also questions the reader to evaluate themselves as to how they use their own voice I'm giving this 3. Also, while I really enjoyed the very scientific parts of the novel I've done modules on neuroscience, language and cognitive psychology so it was easy for me to follow and relish in this re-learning experience I can understand why this aspect may not be appealing to others as some parts were very science heavy.

If we must learn, let us ask our husbands in the closeness of the home, for it is shameful that a woman question God-ordained male leadership.

View all 22 comments. Aug 22, Felice Laverne rated it liked it Shelves: dystopian , full-review , women-s-fiction , read , netgalley , reviewed-on-amazon.

Somewhere along the line, what was known as the Bible Belt, that swath of Southern states where religion ruled, started expanding.

But the corset turned into a full bodysuit, eventually reaching all the way to Hawaii. And we never saw Somewhere along the line, what was known as the Bible Belt, that swath of Southern states where religion ruled, started expanding.

And we never saw it coming. Hmmm, what a concept. Some crossed the border into Canada; others left on boats for Cuba, Mexico, the islands.

The plot of Vox is simple. Who are trapped in America stripped of their jobs, their personal finances and their words. Once at the forefront of her field and on the verge of finding a cure for disease of the brain, she is now reduced to being confined within the four walls of her home, counting her words for the day and making dinner.

You need to be taught a lesson. It was as if Dalcher started out with a lofty idea but could not sustain it and, instead, resorted the love affairs and gorillas yes, gorillas to tell the story instead.

Lackluster is a more accurate one. The premise was enticing, the title is arresting, and the cover art is just enough — minimalist in a way that highlights the words snatched from these women.

There was an unexpected plot twist surrounding one of Dr. What I appreciated most about this novel were those few moments where Dalcher snuck in the truly disturbing and uncomfortable, mostly through moments between Jean and her six-year-old daughter, Sonia.

And our little Sonia lived up to that duty in several satisfying moments in Vox. The ending is a jumbled hot mess, a series of unlikely though convenient events.

I hate quickly summed-up bow-tie endings that feel rushed, like a six-year-old hurrying to tell mommy all about their day. To me, they are the ultimate cop-out and proof pudding of lack of true skill and finesse as a writer.

The Goodreads description of this book made me think Vox would take more time to explore and lay out the events around the breakdown of American society to the point that women become voxes.

For the most part, all of the deterioration of American society has already happened at the start of the book though we do get snippy interior commentary on it from Jean , and we follow her around watching her days as she copes with it.

Better luck next time. View all 20 comments. Aug 30, Jenny Reading Envy rated it it was ok Shelves: reviewcopy , ebooks , netgalley , read This one didn't really work for me, but I am giving it one more star than I feel to compensate for my current state of mind - I'm not really feeling into dystopia at the moment, and that isn't this book's fault.

I also haven't been able to stomach the second season of The Handmaid's Tale. It's interesting to me how many people are bailing or rating this low because the bad guys are Christians.

I'm seeing a lot of "not all Christians" rhetoric here. But to those people I would say, look around! W This one didn't really work for me, but I am giving it one more star than I feel to compensate for my current state of mind - I'm not really feeling into dystopia at the moment, and that isn't this book's fault.

Where are the Christians in the actual world, while citizens are denied passports , children are separated from their parents I don't even need a link for that one, votes of black people are overwhelmingly suppressed compared to other populations and there is a marked increase in hate crime?

Oh, that's not your fault, you say? Have you spoken up, have you done anything? See, that's the underlying premise of this novel, the part that I feel is most effective.

The main character is a scholar, aware of situations in the news, but not convinced she herself can or should do anything, and by the time she does it's too late.

And by then women's voices are literally being taken away. And those who claim to be Christians in power silence those who are in their same group, even if they wouldn't have been radical - they quickly get on board so as not to lose the upper hand.

This was far too familiar of a feeling. Being radicalized is not exclusive to one religion. If you're going to pull a notallchristians, double check your beliefs and actions against verses like James Another reason to keep this at an okay rating rather than lower.

It's obviously causing a reaction. There is a chilling moment which I can't quote exactly since I had an uncorrected proof, where the comment is made that the final decisions were made about taking voices away WHEN they started marching.

The rest of it felt too far-fetched to even work as a dystopian novel. Jean too easily goes back to her work when she is needed, doesn't seem to worry at all about surveillance, and doesn't seem to worry about the power her male children have, even after her son's girlfriend gets TAKEN AWAY for having sex with him.

We know from actual history China, Germany about children turning in their parents. I mean come on. And more disappointingly, that's not really how the characters suffer a downfall, so even if they would have been incredibly stupid to do those things, I would have felt the book was better if they had received consequences aligned with that stupidity I would understand that.

So while I engaged with this book as described above, it definitely wasn't what I would have hoped for. Thanks to the publisher for providing access to the title through NetGalley.

Instagram Twitter Facebook Amazon Pinterest I'm very upset about all the people who read this book and walked away thinking, "Not all Christians!

Not all men! I'm not saying that to be mean. I honestly believe that as a fact. History is full of people who have covered their ears when people say things that they don't want to listen to.

Look at all the Instagram Twitter Facebook Amazon Pinterest I'm very upset about all the people who read this book and walked away thinking, "Not all Christians!

Look at all the people who continue to furiously support Trump, despite the fact that he's proved time and time again that he is not only a bad politician, but also a bad human being, with his efforts to use his station to alienate our allies and twist the laws for his own personal gain.

It's a perversion of both justice and democracy, and yet the people who support him really seem to believe that they have the moral high ground.

How does this work? Is it that cognitive dissonance grows stronger as the evidence mounts, because it's easier to believe a lie than that you've made an egregious lapse in moral judgment?

I wonder. With VOX, Christina Dalcher explores a concept that has explored many times: what happens if a bunch of radical extremists seize control of a nation and oppress them with brutal savagery in the name of a greater good?

The heroine is a woman named Jean who used to be a neurologist, and now she is a housewife. She feels the rub of her imprisonment every day, from men who actively oppress her like the president , to men who passively and cowardly support the status quo like her husband , to men who embrace the new laws in blithe ignorance because it tells them what they want to hear like her son.

I have never wanted to punch as many people as I did while reading this book and actually had to step back for a week because it was making me so upset.

VOX starts out more strongly than it ends which I'll be getting to later , but the premise is a striking one: Christian fundamentalists have taken control of the country with something called the Pure Movement.

Men are the glory of God; and women are the glory of man, subservient and secondary in every way. Those in power have managed to achieve this by affixing counters to every woman's wrist that monitor how many words they speak a day.

The limit is , less than a Tweet, and speaking more than the limit delivers a painful electric shock that becomes more powerful with every word spoken past the limit, eventually becoming lethal.

This seems a little silly, the idea of a word counter that looks like a FitBit. But certain types of men are always trying to silence or discredit women.

Just last week, for example, I answered a question about science that someone asked, and one of the men reflexively said, "No, that's wrong!

Someone at the table looked up the answer, and, of course, I was right. Did this person apologize to me? They just shrugged, as if to say, "Well, even a broken clock is right at least twice a day.

The universe created in this novel doesn't really feel like such a stretch if you think of how many people in the world long for an idealistic version of the s when women weren't allowed to express themselves or push the boundaries of gender norms, and minorities were kept safely out of sight.

The second half of this novel deals with some interesting science. Interesting in the fact that it does kind of feel like one of those cheesy, less popular Michal Crichton novels, or a Dan Brown novel, in that you find yourself suspending more disbelief than you'd like while also pondering the realism of the literary equivalent of a cackling mad scientist looming against a lightning-strewn backdrop.

At the same time, there's a historical precedent of performing unspeakable medical practices against the oppressed, so this isn't as comfortably fantastical as some might like to believe, either.

And sometimes, taking the reductio ad absurdum approach works in literature because it forces us to realize that our reality is almost absurd as the satires that are created to rebuke it.

What does that say about us, I wonder? Reading VOX is almost guaranteed to upset the reader, but if you find yourself growing angry at the women - or the author - of the story, you should probably ask yourself why.

View all 24 comments. Apr 09, Mohammed Arabey rated it it was ok. But what if women were limited to just ? May be it's just me who felt the pages novel annoyingly too long..

The idea is really great, but the writing style with overuse of unnecessary medical details, unbelievable coincidences, some flat characters or the lack of feeling them, presenting the Adultery as if it's fine for the main 'mother' And the too much of line and scenes that ends with expect that didn't happen or something like this..

That really made me disappointed.. The story has its scary moment of how men may behave about that, even the closest ones like sons.. Well, I needed this story, this strong crazy serious idea and plot to be in a story that much stronger and faster View 2 comments.

After sitting down with Vox it became immediately apparent to me that my feelings were going to be drastically different with this title.

The stories are similar in the generalist of comparisons but Dalcher has brought the idea into this era in time to make it easier to relate to. Vox opens introducing readers to Dr.

Jean McClellan who has been downgraded from her status as a leading doctor in her field of study to nothing more than a housewife cooking and cleaning and caring for her four children.

With flashbacks into the past readers are given a look at how this world could have possibly come about where women are closely monitored and punished if they dare to speak more than words a day.

With a husband and three sons you easily see the comparison to how males are treated to how Jean and her young daughter are treated. Writing styles aside between these two books Vox still wins hands down as my favorite for giving a reader the hows and whys to the world peppered throughout the story.

As Vox goes on it really felt as if the author gave voice to the little questions that would plague me all the while weaving a tale that captured my attention and gained my sympathy to the character.

And then when finished I will just say the outcome was also a lot more satisfying this time around too leaving me to rate Vox at 4. I received an advance copy from the publisher via NetGalley.

View all 9 comments. Apr 16, Trudi rated it it was ok Shelves: the-big-letdown , dystopia , arc , , netgalley , love-the-premise , twss.

Ah damn. I had such high hopes for this one. There's some good ideas contained therein, but none of them are really developed, and a lot of the themes just seem too heavy-handed and on the nose.

There is no subtlety, no allegory, the author is using an anvil Ah damn. There is no subtlety, no allegory, the author is using an anvil in heeding her warnings painting in big giant billboards -- do you SEE?

The book did get me to think about how all of humanity might be improved if everyone was limited to a hundred words a day.

Because seriously, people are the worst and say the stupidest shittiest things non-stop. A copy was provided through NetGalley for review.

View all 3 comments. Jan 10, Susanne Strong rated it it was amazing Shelves: edelweiss , five-star-reads , buddy-read.

Powerful and Terrifying! Set in the United States, all women have been silenced. Their lives are completely restricted. We are now only allowed to speak words per day.

The limitation is controlled by counter on our wrists that will zap us every time we go over. For each infraction, the penalty is more severe.

No one is safe. Except the male gender, that is.

Full review. While there may be different ways to be good and to express caring, The Good Doctor suggests, it is something worth aspiring to -- an idea that may especially appeal to viewers who have experienced health care as scary, impersonal and alienating.

Sensitively portrayed by Bates Motel star Freddie Highmore, the character is extraordinarily gifted but often underestimated by those around him.

Murphy's more rigid way of understanding the world drives much of what makes The Good Doctor stand out.

Shore has established the boilerplate world, and thanks to his leads, it has potential to evolve. In the hands of [David] Shore, and with actors of the calibre of Richard Schiff, it somehow works.

It's a show that could develop into something interesting-and has enough beautiful people in scrubs to keep viewers engaged-but feels familiar in the premiere.

There have been few storylines that stand out beyond the typical medical drama; this one's just done well enough to make you buy in, thanks especially to Freddie Highmore's committed, layered turn.

Sign Up. I forgot my password. Already have a Flicks Account? Sign in. Remembered your password? Sign In. This is what will appear next to your ratings and reviews.

I don't know, create one for me. The Good Doctor: Season 4 Share. All Reviews 8. The Good Doctor. Home Ganze Folgen Darsteller Videos.

The Good Doctor Erdbeben. FREE Mi Anders zu sein, macht manchmal den Unterschied. Mehr Themen und Infos.

Freddie Highmore spielt Dr. Shaun Murphy. Richard Schiff spielt Dr. Aaron Glassman. Hill Harper spielt Dr. Marcus Andrews. Nicholas Gonzalez spielt Dr.

Vox Good Doctor Aktuelle Ausgabe

Beau Garrett spielt Jessica Preston. Die Betrogene errichtet daraufhin eine Festung aus Eis, in der die Liebe verboten ist. Richard Armitage. Unterdessen sind die Ärzte mit einem Mann beschäftigt, dem bei bei einem früheren Unfall in der Landwirtschaft beide Arme abgerissen wurden. Folgen Sie uns auf. Dieses Duo steckt hinter Filmy Fantasy Serie. OV-Trailer zum Katastrophendrama "Songbird". Derweil behandeln die Kollegen in der Secret Service Film einen Football-Profi, der sich nicht mehr bewegen kann. Er kann dem Marterpfahl entfliehen, doch in den Bergen kommt es zum Showdown… Die letzte Der Misanthrop des tragischen Indianerhäuptlings Wie Alt Ist Konny Reimann in ganz Deutschland für Tränen. November, ist sie im ZDF zu sehen, im Auch Pingu Serie Vater ist bereits unter mysteriösen Umständen ums Leben gekommen. Neue Arztserie. Home Ganze Folgen Darsteller Videos. Das beste aus dem magazin.